by matt.jolly
Rockhopper01 wrote:
MeGusta wrote:
How did this make it past moderation as a review? There is literally one sentence of critique.
What?
1. He gave his opinion that the abstractions work well for the theme.
2. He gave his opinion that the Cold War theme was strong in the game.
3. He gave his opinion that the many ways to win are brilliant.
4. He gave his opinion that the game is always tense.
5. He gave his opinion that the theme helped support solo play.
6. He gave his opinion of the game's shortcomings as a solo game.
7. He gave his opinion that despite those shortcomings, the gameplay was still interesting solo.
8. He gave his opinion on an appropriate rating.
There are probably a few more points made, this is just what I saw with a cursory reading.
What else do you want in a review exactly?
I agree.
As a rare player (four games) of TS, none of which I really enjoyed, I was interested to hear the reviewer's points about solo play.
I would not rate the game highly myself(boo hiss) but the reviewer clearly states that there are enough reviews of the game, and he intends to cover a specific aspect, and one which despite my own low opinion of the game, interests me. So thank you Garfink!
Cheers
Matt